Securing What Matters: Practical Steps to Safeguard Patient Data in a Digital Healthcare Landscape

calendar10/27/2025
clock 6 min read
feature image

The Australian healthcare system is no stranger to delivering top-notch care. The 2025 OECD Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS), which surveyed over 100,000 patients and nearly 2,000 primary care practices across 19 countries, ranked Australia among the top five in quality of care, coordination of care, person-centred care, and physical health. 

But excellence in care has made Australian healthcare organisations high-value targets. Recently, malicious actors have positioned themselves at the perimeter, systematically targeting sensitive data that underpins the country’s healthcare system. In 2024, Australia saw a 25% increase in data breach notifications from the previous year, with 20% of all data breach notifications coming from the healthcare sector: now a primary target zone in the nation’s cybersecurity landscape.  

Each successful breach compromises multiple fronts simultaneously — patient safety, operational continuity, and hard-won trust that forms the foundation of effective healthcare delivery. The mandate is clear: Safeguarding patient data requires strategic fortification and constant vigilance.

The New Battleground: Patient Trust Under Siege

Data remains a most sought-after resource, valued by healthcare organisations and adversaries alike. While trust in the healthcare system remains high (72% of adults in Australia share that they trust the sector most or all of the time), research found that those on the frontlines of patient care recognise the vulnerability firsthand:

  • 59% expressed concern about the possibility of data breaches in their organisation.
  • Clinical staff (61%) shared a higher level of concern about breaches than non-clinical staff (58%).
  • 74% felt apprehensive about sharing private data with other organisations.

These concerns are well-founded. Patient data forms the foundation of the patient-provider relationship. Unfortunately, this value is also reflected in cybercriminal activity: Healthcare data commands premium value in illicit markets, making every patient record a strategic asset worth defending. Breaches extend beyond financial or operational harm to emotional distress, misdiagnoses, treatment delays, and in drastic cases, urgent care disruptions — critical issues healthcare organisations face globally.

The stakes are tangible in incidents like the University Medical Center Health System (UMC) breach in Texas, where a ransomware attack forced UMC to divert all incoming emergency patients via ambulance to other nearby facilities.

With cyber incidents showing no signs of slowing down, patients increasingly expect transparency, control, and accountability in data handling. Trust is now a strategic asset that demands cultural and operational transformation — not just technical fixes.

Fortifying the Frontlines: Strengthening Security Across the Data Lifecycle

If trust is the battleground, data is the terrain: vast, fragmented, and vulnerable to exploitation without strategic oversight. Defending it requires optimising visibility, automation, and access control across the data lifecycle.

Establishing Data Visibility and Risk Awareness

Visibility is the cornerstone of control, yet many healthcare providers lack a clear mapping of where sensitive data resides or moves. Data security posture management (DSPM) addresses this critical gap by discovering, classifying, and monitoring sensitive data across cloud and on-premises environments and turns blind spots into strategic vantage points. Without real-time insight into data flows and access patterns, organisations stay reactive rather than become preventive.

DSPM enables proactive risk assessment by:

  • Identifying where sensitive data lives across systems.
  • Mapping how data moves between users, platforms, and third parties.
  • Detecting misconfigurations and overexposed assets before they become breach points.

This visibility enables healthcare organisations to prioritise remediation and reduce exposure before threats materialise.

Automating Governance to Minimise Human Error

Manual governance is inefficient and risky. In high-pressure healthcare environments, expecting staff to manually manage classification, retention policies, and access logs is unrealistic. Human error – whether through oversight or fatigue – leads to misclassified records, excessive data retention, and missed compliance deadlines.

Automation enforces governance consistently, at scale:

  • Automated classification tags sensitive data from the moment it enters the system.
  • Lifecycle management tools apply retention and disposal rules based on regulatory requirements.
  • Policy enforcement reduces the risk of overexposure and frees up storage resources

DSPM-driven automation minimises manual intervention, allowing organisations to shift focus from data housekeeping to patient care.

Enforcing Access Controls and Collaboration Boundaries 

Access control is the gatekeeper of data security. In multidisciplinary healthcare settings, maintaining strict boundaries around data access is essential.

Key access control strategies include:

  • Role-based access to ensure individuals only see data relevant to their responsibilities.
  • Multi-factor authentication (MFA) for secure remote access.
  • External sharing controls to prevent sensitive information from leaving the organisation unintentionally.

Access control must be dynamic. As roles evolve, automated access reviews and permission audits must maintain least-privilege access, minimising data exposure without disrupting clinical workflows.

Securing the Perimeter: Operationalising Compliance in Healthcare Workflows 

Once frontlines are fortified, healthcare organisations must embed compliance as continuous discipline, rather than checkbox duties. 

Embedding Regulatory Alignment Into Daily Operations

Regulatory frameworks like the My Health Records Act and Australian Privacy Principles establish data handling groundwork, yet implementation is where organisations stumble. Compliance must be woven into clinical workflows, administrative processes, and digital systems, rather than remain a policy document.

Embedding compliance requires:

  • Integrating privacy and security protocols into routine data handling procedures.
  • Ensuring staff understand how regulations apply to their roles, especially in high-risk areas like patient intake, diagnostics, and data sharing.
  • Designing systems that enforce compliance by default, such as automated breach notifications and consent tracking. 

By ensuring compliance is embedded into the rhythm of daily operations, Australian healthcare organisations transform it from an obligation to a strategic mechanism.

Maintaining Continuous Audit Readiness

Audit readiness is about sustained preparedness. Healthcare organisations must be able to demonstrate how data is collected, accessed, retained, and disposed of in accordance with legal requirements.

Key practices for maintaining audit readiness include:

  • Centralised logging and reporting of data access and usage.
  • Automated documentation of policy enforcement and lifecycle actions.
  • Regular internal reviews to identify gaps before external audits do.

With these practices in place, organisations can respond confidently to regulatory inquiries and build credibility with patients, partners, and oversight bodies.

The AvePoint Confidence Platform: Turning Strategy Into Action

In any battle, strategy is only as strong as its execution. Defending sensitive data requires more than intent: It requires tools that translate strategy into practice. The AvePoint Confidence Platform offers DSPM capabilities designed to address persistent risks and operational demands outlined above.

Key capabilities include:

  • Automated governance. The platform classifies sensitive data and applies retention policies from the outset, reducing manual effort and supporting compliance with the My Health Records Act.
  • Access control enforcement. Role-based permissions and automated access reviews help maintain least-privilege access, while external sharing controls reduce the risk of unauthorised exposure.
  • Continuous risk visibility. Real-time monitoring surfaces oversharing, misconfigurations, and orphaned records, enabling teams to respond before vulnerabilities escalate.
  • Streamlined audit readiness. Built-in reporting tools simplify documentation and support ongoing compliance with Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) guidelines.

The Confidence Platform integrates with existing systems, empowering healthcare professionals to focus on care while data governance and security operate in the background. For organisations seeking to move from reactive defence to proactive control, it offers a practical, scalable foundation for safeguarding patient trust. 

Holding the Line and Ensuring Patient Trust

Safeguarding patient data is an ongoing campaign, not a single battle. By fortifying defences and operationalising compliance, healthcare organisations build resilience and maintain trust. With the right strategies and robust DSPM, the sector can meet evolving threats and regulatory demands. With the right strategies and technology, the Australian healthcare system can meet evolving threats while ensuring care integrity and patient confidence. 

author

Janine Morris

Janine Morris is an experienced information management professional who helps organizations reduce information chaos and improve employee experience while meeting regulatory and compliance requirements, especially those related to AI and data security. She holds a Master's degree in Information Management and her professional approach and passion have earned her solid recognition in the industry, including being recognized as a Membership Fellow (FRIM) and serving as a former board director and branch president of RIMPA Global.